MitalAshok added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr14xx.cpp:433
- S s1;
- S s2 = {s1}; // ok, not list-initialization so we pick the non-explicit
constructor
- }
----------------
This relies on the old wording. "If T is a class type and the initializer list
has a single element of type cv U, where U is T or a class derived from T, the
object is initialized from that element (by copy-initialization for
copy-list-initialization, or by direct-initialization for
direct-list-initialization)".
"If T is a class type" -> "If T is an aggregate class type", so this
copy-list-initialization remains copy-list-initialization (and should fail for
picking the explicit constructor)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D156032/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D156032
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
