alexfh added a comment. In D154324#4516964 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D154324#4516964>, @alexfh wrote:
> In D154324#4516917 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D154324#4516917>, @ChuanqiXu > wrote: > >> Maybe we got something wrong with this. I'd like to revert this patch in >> case it breaks something. But would you like to reduce your reproducer >> further to a state without external includes to STL or protobuf? Then we can >> add the reduced reproducer to the tests to avoid further regressions. > > That turned out to be quite time-consuming, but I can try nevertheless. I > also asked @rsmith if he could figure out what the problem is. Hopefully, he > can help with the test case, if gets to the bottom of the problem. I have a reduced reproducer, but I still depends on the internal build setup. I need a bit more time to make the reproducer standalone. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D154324/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D154324 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
