steakhal added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/lifetime-cfg-output.cpp:1
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -analyze 
-analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG -analyzer-config 
cfg-lifetime=true,cfg-temporary-dtors=false,cfg-rich-constructors=false 
-analyzer-config cfg-implicit-dtors=false %s > %t 2>&1
 // RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t %s
----------------
tomasz-kaminski-sonarsource wrote:
> @xazax.hun 
> A side question, this test disables `cfg-temporary-dtors`, 
> `cfg-rich-constructors`, and `cfg-implicit-dtors` that are enabled by default 
> for the analyzer. 
> This was done because our changes [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153273 | 
> D153273 ]] these functionalities were incompatible, and there were assertions 
> triggering.
> I would like to update the test to just enable `cfg-lifetime` similarly to 
> what `cfg-scopes` do, so we catch any regressions, however, we will not test 
> this functionality alone.
> Is this something you (upstream) would accept? If so I can create NFC patch.
Makes sense to me.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D155547/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D155547

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to