cor3ntin added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/source_location.cpp:796
+static_assert(S(0).i == S{0}.i);
+static_assert(S(0).j == S{0}.i);
+}
----------------
tbaeder wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > cor3ntin wrote:
> > > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > > Shouldn't this test fail because `i != j`?
> > > >
> > > > Can you add a test that demonstrates we've corrected the source
> > > > location information for diagnostics?
> > > They should all be equal!
> > >
> > > > Can you add a test that demonstrates we've corrected the source
> > > > location information for diagnostics?
> > >
> > > Hum, i was planning to do that in https://reviews.llvm.org/D155175. I can
> > > try to think of something there!
> > > They should all be equal!
> >
> > Whaaaaa? Shouldn't `i == 790 && j == 791`?
> IIUC, they are evaluated as part of the constructor, so the values should be
> 795 or 796. Maybe that can be changed to
> ```
> static_assert(S(0).i == S{0}.i == 796);
> ```
> ?
This is https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155573/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155573
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
