hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2c-placeholder-vars.cpp:2
+// RUN: %clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++2c -Wunused-parameter
-Wunused %s
+
+void static_var() {
----------------
hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> > hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> > > Can we have tests for:
> > > ```
> > > struct { int _, _; } a = { ._ = 0 };
> > > ```
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > ```
> > > struct A {
> > > A();
> > > int _, _;
> > > };
> > >
> > > A::A() : _(0) {}
> > > ```
> > Codegen test for
> > ```
> > static union { int _ = 42; };
> > int &ref = _;
> > int foo() { return 13; }
> > static union { int _ = foo(); };
> > int main(void) { return ref; }
> > ```
> > might be interesting.
> >
> > I suspect that this case was missed in the committee discussion of the
> > paper @cor3ntin.
> Less controversial tests to consider:
> ```
> struct A {
> int _;
> union { int _; };
> };
> struct B { union { int _, _; }; };
> ```
>
In a similar vein, a codegen test for:
```
struct A { A(); };
inline void f [[gnu::used]]() {
static union { A _{}; };
static union { A _{}; };
}
```
Perhaps not intended to be allowed though (premise was no symbols with
"linkage"?)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153536/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153536
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
