xbolva00 added a comment. In D147714#4446780 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147714#4446780>, @yamt wrote:
>> musttail provide assurances that the tail call can be optimized on all >> targets. > > Such a definition doesn't make much sense because for some targets tail call > optimization isn't available at all. > Eg. Wasm w/o tail call proposal, xtensa windowed abi. > > So I'm not sure what's the point of the new attribute. It seems simpler to > fix the existing musttail attribute. I agree, I consider the original design of this feature as a mistake, which made this attribute kinda unreliable and useless.. I dont think people are willing to just change existing impl of musttail attribute... CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D147714/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D147714 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
