FreddyYe added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/lib/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.cpp:110
   FeatureBitset Features;
+  char Mangling;
+  bool OnlyForCPUDispatchSpecific;
----------------
RKSimon wrote:
> Do we have a documented list of the mangling values anywhere? The values 
> below look too much like magic numbers tbh.
I think not. I copied them from the old MACROs in X86TargetParser.def. I think 
the values are just used to do some distinguish from different CPUs. And 
'a'-'Z' is about to run out of soon here. We probably need to extend the 
mangling, may be with another letter as prefix. @erichkeane may have a better 
answer here.


================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cpus-intel.ll:90
 ; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown 
-mcpu=graniterapids 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR 
--allow-empty
+; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown 
-mcpu=atom_sse4_2_movbe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-ERROR 
--allow-empty
 
----------------
RKSimon wrote:
> put this with the goldmonth checks?
I'll do the adjust. BTW I'd like also to mention below:

Here are the rules I used to add features/tuning model in X86.td for missing 
cpu names in CPU_SPECIFIC Macros:

RULE 1: Infer from the name itself. E.g. pentium_4 -> pentium4, pentium_iii -> 
pentium3
RULE 2: CPU_SPECIFIC_ALIAS can tell me its old name. Using the old name to 
continue to infer.
RULE 3: Use the feature list in CPU_SPECIFIC to compare and append with 
existing CPU names:
```
pentium_4_sse3 -> prescott
core_2_duo_ssse3 -> core2
core_2_duo_sse4_1 -> penryn
atom_sse4_2 -> silvermont
core_i7_sse4_2 -> nehalem
core_aes_pclmulqdq -> westmere
core_5th_gen_avx_tsx -> broadwell
```
There is only one exception: atom_sse4_2_movbe. For now I set it as goldmont 
features and silvermont tuning model according to its definition:
```
CPU_SPECIFIC("atom_sse4_2_movbe", "silvermont", 'd', 
"+cmov,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+ssse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+movbe,+popcnt")
```


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151696

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to