dblaikie added a comment.
In D152017#4396906 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D152017#4396906>, @probinson wrote:
> I experimented with this. Looks like it emits info only for //defined//
> methods, and not //used// methods. That is, if you change the test to say
> `void t1::f1() { f2(); }`
> you get DWARF for f1 but not f2. The way Sony does it, you get DWARF for f1
> and f2.
> (Neither case sees info for f3, which is declared but not defined or used.)
Ah, that's good to understand - didn't realize that's what you folks were
doing. Fair enough then.
> Is that what you intended?
It is.
What's the particular goal/value in including called-but-not-defined functions?
Are your users generally building only parts of their program with debug info &
you want it to be complete-ish in the parts that do have debug info? Because if
they were building the whole program with debug info, /some/ translation unit
would have the definition of the function, and the debug info for it.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152017/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152017
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
