charmitro added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/Frontend/absolute-paths.c:6
+// NORMAL: In file included from [[ROOT_ABSOLUTE]]:4:
+// ABSOLUTE: In file included from [[ROOT_ABSOLUTE]]:4:
 
----------------
tbaeder wrote:
> charmitro wrote:
> > tbaeder wrote:
> > > charmitro wrote:
> > > > tbaeder wrote:
> > > > > This checks the same thing in both cases, but in the `NORMAL` case, 
> > > > > it should //not// use the absolute path, shouldn't it?
> > > > You're correct. I was constantly testing it from the same path.
> > > > 
> > > > Since the relative path is going to be different depending on where you 
> > > > running from, would it be wise to accept a regular expression of any 
> > > > string in the `NORMAL` case?
> > > > 
> > > > For example, 
> > > > ```
> > > > NORMAL: In file included from {{.*}}:
> > > > ```
> > > I wonder if it would make sense to just check for the filename in the 
> > > `NORMAL` case and then do a `NORMAL-NOT: [[ROOT_ABSOLUTE]]`?
> > Yes, that way we are testing if the warning contains the correct 
> > filename+LOC.
> > 
> > Something like: `// NORMAL: In file included from 
> > {{.*absolute-paths.c:4}}:`.
> > 
> > But why changefrom `ABSOLUTE:` to `NORMAL-NOT`?
> Your regex checks if the path ends with the file name, right? That would be 
> true in both cases.
What else do you propose here?

Let me explain why this was the only obvious option for me.

In the case of `NORMAL`, it checks for the relative path based on the location 
you invoke the test commands. 

Given that, if we, for example,
1. run `llvm-lit` from the project root, the `NORMAL` case expects:
```
In file included from clang/test/Frontend/absolute-paths.c:4:
```
2. run `llvm-lit` from `$PROJECT_ROOT/clang/test/`, the `NORMAL` case expects:
```
In file included from Frontend/absolute-paths.c:4:
```

It seems unwise to me to hard-code the path based on what the CI excepts in the 
`NORMAL` scenario, because that way, whoever runs the test cases manually, will 
experience test failure.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151833/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151833

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to