Endill added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr0xx.cpp:1022
-namespace dr78 { // dr78: sup ????
+namespace dr78 { // dr78: no
// Under DR78, this is valid, because 'k' has static storage duration, so is
----------------
shafik wrote:
> shafik wrote:
> > This is [issue 1380](https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/1380) and
> > the issue is whether we want static initialization to happen before
> > constant initialization or whether constant initialization excludes
> > zero-init.
> >
> > I think dr77 is now part of [cwg
> > 2536](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2536.html) and we need to wait
> > for the resolution of that in order to know what to do here.
> I was mistaken and completely missed:
> https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.init#general-8.sentence-2
>
> DR 78 is just repeating what we have in:
> https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.start#static
>
> The wording has changed a lot since DR 78.
Can you please elaborate how does your conclusion affect this patch? Because I
feel a bit lost at this point.
Was my initial analysis correct, and we should say that this DR is not
available in Clang?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151634/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151634
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
