rmaprath added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23926#527080, @EricWF wrote:
> We already provide many C++11 extensions in C++03 mode, why should this be an > exception? This is kind of what I wanted to find out. Do we document what those extensions are? We have quite a strict C library which is picky about what it exposes under different standards. For example, it won't expose `C99` math ops if it is being used under `__cplusplus < 201103L`, which leads to compiler errors (when integrated with `libc++` and used with `-std=c++03`) for a simple program like: #include <math.h> int x; We could make our C library a bit more lenient to fix this, but I couldn't find it documented anywhere what stand `libcxx` takes on C++03 support. I also sent an email to `cfe-dev` about this but didn't get much attention, so I decided to start with a patch instead :) I'm happy to document these C++03 extensions on libcxx.llvm.org if I can find out what those extensions are. Any pointers? Cheers, / Asiri https://reviews.llvm.org/D23926 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
