0x59616e accepted this revision.
0x59616e added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Though creating our own calling convention is better, I think Min's path is 
correct at this moment given that m68k is still an experimental target. We can 
reignite this discussion once we're approaching to becoming a offiical target.

@myhsu could you open an issue to cite this problem ?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D149867/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D149867

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D149867:... Min-Yih Hsu via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D14... Sheng via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D14... Jessica Clarke via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D14... John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D14... Jessica Clarke via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to