zaks.anna added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23853#524945, @xazax.hun wrote:
> > Also: I think r270511 is unlikely to be the change that caused this -- that > > is a change in LLVM's treatment of DebugInfo, which shouldn't affect the > > analyzer. > > > I think Peter means that, that revision introduced the code that the analyzer > fails to analyze (and not the bug in the analyzer). Can you add a reduced test case? https://reviews.llvm.org/D23853 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
