mboehme marked an inline comment as done.
mboehme added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowEnvironment.h:196
+  void popCall(const CallExpr *Call, const Environment &CalleeEnv);
+  void popCall(const CXXConstructExpr *Call, const Environment &CalleeEnv);
 
----------------
xazax.hun wrote:
> I know that Obj-C is a non-goal, but it might worth a comment to support 
> `ObjCMessageExpr` just in case someone wants to work on this. 
> 
> Btw, this is one of my biggest pet peeves about the Clang AST. We should have 
> a common abstraction for all the callables, instead of having to bifurcate 
> many of the APIs. 
Agreed!

I'm a bit hesitant to add a FIXME here though, as that might make it sound as 
if there's a plan to add Objective-C support or at least imply that that's a 
goal. Also, I think Objective-C support would entail quite a bit more than 
adding the right overloads here -- so I'm not sure how helpful the comment here 
would be. I think once someone goes down the road of seriously working on 
Objective-C support, they'll quickly discover that they need a new overload 
here.

I hope this makes sense? Happy to add something in a followup patch if you feel 
we should add some Objective-C "breadcrumbs" here.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151194/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151194

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to