aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D123649#4362756 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649#4362756>, @efriedma wrote:

> In D123649#4362418 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649#4362418>, @aaron.ballman 
> wrote:
>
>> In D123649#4362402 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649#4362402>, @efriedma 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The assertion is correct; without it, your code is getting miscompiled.
>>
>> The assertion may be correct in its intent, but we still should not be 
>> asserting in practice: https://godbolt.org/z/cs5bhvPGr
>
> I wasn't trying to suggest our behavior is correct here, just that the 
> assertion is correctly indicating an underlying issue with the generated IR.

Ah, sorry! I misunderstood. :-)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to