aaron.ballman added a comment. In D123649#4362756 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649#4362756>, @efriedma wrote:
> In D123649#4362418 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649#4362418>, @aaron.ballman > wrote: > >> In D123649#4362402 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649#4362402>, @efriedma >> wrote: >> >>> The assertion is correct; without it, your code is getting miscompiled. >> >> The assertion may be correct in its intent, but we still should not be >> asserting in practice: https://godbolt.org/z/cs5bhvPGr > > I wasn't trying to suggest our behavior is correct here, just that the > assertion is correctly indicating an underlying issue with the generated IR. Ah, sorry! I misunderstood. :-) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits