zahiraam added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/X86/bfloat16.cpp:2-3
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py 
UTC_ARGS: --version 2
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -target-feature +fullbf16 
-S -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -S -emit-llvm %s -o - | 
FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-NBF16 %s
+
----------------
codemzs wrote:
> zahiraam wrote:
> > pengfei wrote:
> > > The backend has already support lowering of `bfloat`, I don't think it's 
> > > necessary to do extra work in FE unless for excess-precision.
> > > The backend has already support lowering of `bfloat`, I don't think it's 
> > > necessary to do extra work in FE unless for excess-precision.
> > 
> > +1.
> @pengfei @zahiraam I added this test to verify bfloat16 IR gen functionality, 
> considering both scenarios: with and without native bfloat16 support. 
> However, if you believe it's more beneficial to omit it, I'm open to doing 
> so. Happy to also move this test to another target that doesn't have backend 
> support for emulation. 
I think that's fine. You can leave it. 


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150913/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150913

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to