erichkeane added a comment. In D146358#4351787 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358#4351787>, @hazohelet wrote:
> In D146358#4350810 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358#4350810>, @erichkeane > wrote: > >> Our downstream discovered that this causes a regression when compiling >> `utility` with `ast-dump`. I've put up a minimal reproducer: >> https://godbolt.org/z/oaezas7Ws >> >> @hazohelet : Will you be able to look into this soon? > > Thanks for the report and the reproducer. > I cannot take sufficient time for about 36 hours, but I'll be able to > investigate it after that. That is long enough away that I unfortunately have to revert (see 34e49d3e85a6dd03856af0fb4b7f8d8ae1f4f06a <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG34e49d3e85a6dd03856af0fb4b7f8d8ae1f4f06a>). Please note that in the LLVM project reverts are common/frequent (we have a policy of 'revert often'), and should not be taken negatively! Please feel free to re-submit this patch with a fix/the test provided, and we'll re-review promptly! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
