Mordante added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/CommandGuide/clang.rst:206-210 + Working draft for ISO C++ 2026 + + | ``gnu++2c`` + + Working draft for ISO C++ 2026 with GNU extensions ---------------- erichkeane wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > We shouldn't call it `ISO C++ 2026` until it's published by ISO. (I don't > > have strong opinions about 2c vs 26 in there, but since we need to update > > it anyway when 26 is released, I figured it'd be easier to find again with > > 2c.) > Ah, I just copied from what we had for C++23 before the flip. But this makes > sense, I chose `2c` for the reason you mentioned. Note that before D149553 similar wording was used for C++2b "Working draft for ISO C++ 2023". CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150450/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150450 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
