shiva0217 added a comment. In D150192#4330199 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150192#4330199>, @efriedma wrote:
> From what I recall, "inrange" is actually more restrictive than the normal > C/C++ array indexing rules. Specifically, the bits regarding comparisons. > "inrange" was designed to allow splitting globals indexed using inrange. > > That isn't to say that functionality like this isn't useful, but we probably > need to call it something different. And I'm not sure an attribute on a GEP > is actually the best way to represent the semantics. It might make sense to > use a separate intrinsic to represent this, especially given the direction of > https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-replacing-getelementptr-with-ptradd/68699 . Hi Eli, Very appreciate your inputs. ^^ Is there any idea how the intrinsic should look like and how it associated with GEP before ptradd arrive? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150192/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150192 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
