thakis added a comment.
In D148769#4311232 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148769#4311232>, @dblaikie wrote:
> I wouldn't mind a follow-up commit that creates a new/separate directory
> (llvm/{lib,include/llvm}/CodeGenTypes) but that's probably a lot of
> unnecessary churn too, so I can appreciate the argument against it - if folks
> reckon it's better this way, that's OK too. It can just get a bit confusing
> when the directory/naming doesn't match the layering, etc. Might make it more
> likely someone regresses these boundaries by introducing new dependencies
> that break the layering here.
I'd really like to see this. That's how virtually all LLVM libraries are laid
out, and it removes the PARTIAL_SOURCES_INTENDED kludge.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D148769/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D148769
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
