aaron.ballman added a comment. In D148505#4300483 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505#4300483>, @sberg wrote:
>> But the fact that these two attributes already confuse users (AND we've got >> unused as an attribute in the mix as well, which doesn't help) means we >> should proceed with caution (and likely coordinate with GCC given that all >> three of these attributes came from their implementation). > > I've brought this up at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-April/241205.html "GCC/Clang > attributes guiding warnings about unused entities" now. (I tried to > cross-post that also to the Clang Frontend discourse category, but that > probably didn't work.) Thank you for poking on this! FWIW, I don't know that there's a way to cross-post to Discourse (but if I'm wrong and there is, I'd love to know how!). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148505 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
