bcraig added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23719#520953, @smeenai wrote:
> @bcraig: `__STDC_NO_ATOMICS__` wouldn't be defined for pre-C11 compilers > either, right? > > From what I understand of the original code sample, one of the purposes was > to check for 64-bit atomic support on 32-bit systems (hence the use of > `uintmax_t` and the check for `__atomic_fetch_add_8`). I don't really know of > a portable way of accomplishing that without at least including `<stdint.h>`. Given the choice of including stdatomic.h or stdint.h, I'll gladly take stdint.h. libc++ shouldn't require a C11 enabled C library. C++14 only requires C99. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23719 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
