TIFitis marked 2 inline comments as done.
TIFitis added inline comments.

================
Comment at: mlir/test/Target/LLVMIR/omptarget-llvm.mlir:4-5
-llvm.func @_QPopenmp_target_data() {
-  %0 = llvm.mlir.constant(1 : i64) : i64
-  %1 = llvm.alloca %0 x i32 {bindc_name = "i", in_type = i32, 
operand_segment_sizes = array<i32: 0, 0>, uniq_name = 
"_QFopenmp_target_dataEi"} : (i64) -> !llvm.ptr<i32>
   omp.target_data   map((tofrom -> %1 : !llvm.ptr<i32>)) {
----------------
kiranchandramohan wrote:
> TIFitis wrote:
> > kiranchandramohan wrote:
> > > Why is the test changed?
> > Moved the map_operand to function parameter to be consistent with other 
> > tests. I think it can remain unchanged if you prefer.
> Consistency can be achieved in a follow-up NFC patch that you can submit 
> without review. If the test can only show the differences of this patch it is 
> easier to review.
Thanks for letting me know. I've updated the tests.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D146557/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D146557

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to