b-sumner added a comment. In D148796#4284504 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148796#4284504>, @rampitec wrote:
> We used to support it that way and decided just not doing it. It is very hard > to explain why a supported atomic results in error. Someone who really needs > it can use intrinsic. I tend to agree. This oddity is probably best handled with an intrinsic. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148796/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148796 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
