akyrtzi added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp:905
+  if (BriefResult) {
+    llvm::outs() << "num modules: " << FD->getNumModules() << '\n';
+    return HadErrors;
----------------
jansvoboda11 wrote:
> akyrtzi wrote:
> > jansvoboda11 wrote:
> > > This assumes `FD` is not empty, i.e. the `-format experimental-full` 
> > > argument. We should probably error out early if that's not the case.
> > > 
> > > WDYT about changing the new `-brief` flag into something like `-format 
> > > experimental-brief`? We could avoid the dependency between arguments and 
> > > we'd also make it clear the `make` and `p1689` don't have a brief variant.
> > > This assumes FD is not empty,
> > 
> > Ah, good catch! I'll fix.
> > 
> > > WDYT about changing the new -brief flag into something like -format 
> > > experimental-brief? 
> > 
> > I consider `-brief` orthogonal to the format kind, there's no reason we 
> > can't have brief versions of the other formats.
> > I consider `-brief` orthogonal to the format kind, there's no reason we 
> > can't have brief versions of the other formats.
> 
> How would a brief make or P1689 output look like?
`make` could print the number of file dependencies and `P1689` maybe also 
prints the number of modules (I'm not familiar with that).

In [the apple 
fork](https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/blob/871776e79523b121f3a0d0b06cf582092445369f/clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp#L145)
 there are additional formats added that would have the same `-brief` output as 
in this patch, without any changes.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D148369/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D148369

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to