sammccall accepted this revision. sammccall added inline comments. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/WalkAST.cpp:85 // This is the underlying decl used by TemplateSpecializationType, can be // null when type is dependent if so fallback to primary template. CXXRecordDecl *TD = TST->getAsCXXRecordDecl(); ---------------- update comment - dependent or not resolved to a pattern yet? ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/unittests/WalkASTTest.cpp:163 ElementsAre(Decl::ClassTemplatePartialSpecialization)); + // Incomplete templates don't have a specific specialization associated. + EXPECT_THAT(testWalk(R"cpp( ---------------- There's no incomplete template here (did you mean `template <typename struct Foo;` or `template <typename T> struct Foo<T*>;`?) If it's enough that the template is never instantiated then maybe it's still clearer not to provide a definition (and tweak the comment slightly?) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148158/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148158 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits