njames93 requested changes to this revision.
njames93 added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.

From an architectural point of view, is there any reason we don't change the 
backend to treat checks internally as a vector?

`clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/index.rst` also needs updating to specify 
this new behaviour.



================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions.cpp:73
     for (const auto &KeyValue : OptionMap)
-      Options.emplace_back(std::string(KeyValue.getKey()), 
KeyValue.getValue().Value);
+      Options.emplace_back(std::string(KeyValue.getKey()),
+                           KeyValue.getValue().Value);
----------------
Any reason for this line changing, this formatting change looks unrelated.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions.cpp:129-141
+    // Special case for reading from YAML
+    // Must support reading from both a string or a list
+    Input &I = reinterpret_cast<Input &>(IO);
+    if (isa<ScalarNode>(I.getCurrentNode()) ||
+        isa<BlockScalarNode>(I.getCurrentNode())) {
+      Checks.AsString = std::string();
+      yamlize(IO, *Checks.AsString, true, Ctx);
----------------
All this code can just be inlined into the function below and this function can 
just be removed


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions.cpp:132-133
+    Input &I = reinterpret_cast<Input &>(IO);
+    if (isa<ScalarNode>(I.getCurrentNode()) ||
+        isa<BlockScalarNode>(I.getCurrentNode())) {
+      Checks.AsString = std::string();
----------------



================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:304
 - Fixed an issue in :doc:`modernize-concat-nested-namespaces
-  <clang-tidy/checks/modernize/concat-nested-namespaces>` when using macro 
between 
+  <clang-tidy/checks/modernize/concat-nested-namespaces>` when using macro 
between
   namespace declarations could result incorrect fix.
----------------
This change is unrelated and should be pushed as an NFC commit


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147876/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147876

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to