qiucf added a comment. In D143479#4243143 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D143479#4243143>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Based on GCC's behavior: https://godbolt.org/z/fxWzPTT9P I suspect our > behavior is consistent/correct now, and the 'regressions' are to be expected, > since GCC diagnoses the same things we do (just nicer, albeit, less > informative). This is expected. But we can do better like GCC to find 'real target requirements from called intrinsics' of a function, which may be a larger change though. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143479/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143479 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
