owenpan added a comment.

In D137327#4233551 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137327#4233551>, @thieta wrote:
> In D137327#4233290 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137327#4233290>, 
> @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
>
>> because of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61785 should this 
>> really be reverted?  is basically saying `X * Y {`  must be `X *Y{`  but 
>> that obviously not the case
>
> Tricky one. Any ideas on how we could differentiate those two cases? Maybe 
> impossible? Not sure what the normal way to handle ambiguous things like that 
> in clang-format is.

We can add a `Types` option similar to `StatementMacros`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D137327/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D137327

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to