LegalizeAdulthood added inline comments.
Herald added a reviewer: njames93.
Herald added a subscriber: PiotrZSL.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/modernize/redundant-void-arg.cpp:596
+
+// Explicitly specifying `(void)` is a way to sidestep -Wvexing-parse, so we
+// should not warn about it here.
----------------
This is not the only way to eliminate the vexing parse warning. For instance,
if the intention is to declare `foo` as a function not in this translation
unit, then:
```
void most_vexing_parse() {
extern int foo();
}
```
does the trick.
Why assume that the only way to fix vexing-parse is to add `(void)`?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126735/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126735
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
