aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp:1595
+ return true;
+ } else if (const auto *CE = dyn_cast<CallExpr>(Initializer)) {
+ if (!this->emitDupPtr(Initializer))
----------------
Member calls as well?
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/Context.cpp:84-85
+ if (T->isAnyComplexType())
+ return std::nullopt;
+
----------------
Hmmm, this seems surprising to me, I would have assumed that _Complex needed to
be a primitive type so that we could perform typical math on it rather than
treat it as a pair of values.
================
Comment at: clang/test/AST/Interp/complex.cpp:7
+
+constexpr _Complex double z1 = {1.0, 2.0};
+static_assert(__real(z1) == 1.0);
----------------
Can you add tests for `_Complex int` as well? (That's also covered by
`isAnyComplexType()`)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146408/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146408
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
