Eugene.Zelenko added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:237
 
+- Fixed an issue in :doc:`google-avoid-underscore-in-googletest-name
+  <clang-tidy/checks/google/avoid-underscore-in-googletest-name>` when using
----------------
Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> carlosgalvezp wrote:
> > PiotrZSL wrote:
> > > carlosgalvezp wrote:
> > > > Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> > > > > Please keep alphabetical order (by check name) in this section.
> > > > I was planning to do that but noticed that the alphabetical order is 
> > > > already broken. It seems to be a source of friction and there's no 
> > > > official documentation that states it should be done like that, so I 
> > > > can understand if it gets broken often. Do you know if this is 
> > > > documented somewhere? If not, do we see value in keeping this 
> > > > convention? I suppose now we would need an NFC patch to fix the order 
> > > > again, causing churn.
> > > I run into same issue also. I would say, let leave it as it is, and fix 
> > > it with one commit at the end of release.
> > Good idea, let's do that!
> Often it's also broken after rebases which may be automatic.
Anyway, some kind of order is much better than disorder.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D146655/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D146655

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to