nridge added a comment.

My understanding is that a more elaborate configuration scheme has been 
proposed in https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1367, and the feedback 
there was (quoting Sam from this comment 
<https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1367#issuecomment-1322018307>):

> I think this design is very complicated for the value it provides. [...]
> For `<>` vs `""` in particular, we do have multiple reports suggesting this. 
> I think we should be open to a either a **simple** config-based solution

The approach taken in this patch seemed to me to be in line with this direction 
of a "simple config-based solution".


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D145843/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D145843

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to