aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/InternalsManual.rst:3285 + * Are there known issues with the feature that reject valid code? + * Are there known issues that fail to reject invalid code? + * Are there known crashes, failed assertions, or miscompilations? ---------------- cor3ntin wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > cor3ntin wrote: > > > any way to rephrase that, "that cause clamg to reject" maybe? > > Sure, we can go with "accept invalid code" instead of "fail to reject > > invalid". > is the issue the thing that accepts the code? that's what bugs me I'm trying to list out two problems separately: the first is when we reject code that we should be accepting, and the second is when we accept code that we should be rejecting. I think I see where your confusion is coming from, how about: ``` * Are there known issues where we reject valid code that should be accepted? * Are there known issues where we accept invalid code that should be rejected? ``` CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146420/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146420 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
