aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D131307#4197789 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131307#4197789>, @erichkeane 
wrote:

> In D131307#4197767 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131307#4197767>, @rsmith wrote:
>
>>> Based on feedback we will provide users to the ability to downgrade this 
>>> this diagnostic to a waring to allow for a transition period. We expect to 
>>> turn this diagnostic to an error in the next release.
>>
>> Can we revert this now?
>
> Seems appropriate.  Aaron, WDYT?

I think it's fine -- if we get significant user feedback after 16 goes out to 
the public which suggests we need to retain this for longer, it's easy enough 
to bring back from version control.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D131307/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D131307

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D131307: ... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D131... Erich Keane via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D131... Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to