jdoerfert added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:8634 +def warn_hip_omp_target_directives : Warning< + "HIP does not support OpenMP target directives; directive has been ignored">, + InGroup<HIPOpenMPOffloading>; ---------------- yaxunl wrote: > jdoerfert wrote: > > mhalk wrote: > > > jdoerfert wrote: > > > > I doubt the ignored part very much. > > > I just re-checked the LLVM IR of an example. > > > With -x c++ there are __kmpc_target_(de)init calls; with -x hip there are > > > none. > > > https://godbolt.org/z/fhds46Pvc > > > > > > From my point of view, "effectively", target directives seem to have been > > > ignored. > > > Maybe this is a coincidence (there's definitely some uncertainty) or I am > > > misinterpreting the IR. > > > I would be glad if you could shed some light on this, if possible / you > > > find the time to do so. > > Line 512 in the HIP output: https://godbolt.org/z/n5s5jz7j9. > If I remove --offload-arch for the C++ program, I got the same result as for > HIP: > > https://godbolt.org/z/4TMzxdfj6 > > Does that mean we should emit the same error for C++ too? I honestly do not follow your logic. As I said in the beginning: I doubt the directive is ignored. My link showed you that it doesn't ignore the pragma, e.g., the code w/ and w/o the pragma have different results. This is also true for C++, but that doesn't make the warning any more accurate. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D145591/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D145591 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits