zatrazz added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23420#513824, @jroelofs wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23420#513820, @zatrazz wrote: > > > Yes, although in pratice for shared libraries this is not an issue (at > > least on Linux with current linker strategies). And I open for suggestion > > on how to proceed in this case since we have some other options: > > > > 1. Add the required soft-sp implementations when building for Linux (this > > might happen not only on aarch64, but any other ABI that defines long > > double using fallback soft-fp) > > > Are the softfp symbols you need not contained in libgcc.a? Good call, I think just using 'lgcc' should be suffice. I will change the patch. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23420 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
