Eugene.Zelenko added a comment.
Please mention this check in docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (in alphabetical order).
If I'm not mistaken, GCC or Clang has warning that result of comparison is
always true for such situations.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/ComparisonFunctionAddressCheck.h:19
@@ +18,3 @@
+
+/// This Checker gives a warning if address of a function is compared.
+/// For example: the programmer wants to write getc()==0 but writes getc==0.
----------------
Please lowercase Checker. Add add spaces across == below.
================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-comparison-function-address.rst:6
@@ +5,3 @@
+
+This Checker gives a warning if address of a function is compared.
+For example: the programmer wants to write ``getc()==0`` but writes ``getc==0``
----------------
Please lowercase Checker.
================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-comparison-function-address.rst:7
@@ +6,3 @@
+This Checker gives a warning if address of a function is compared.
+For example: the programmer wants to write ``getc()==0`` but writes ``getc==0``
+
----------------
Please add space across ==. Please also run Clang-format over examples code.
================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-comparison-function-address.rst:18
@@ +17,3 @@
+
+as a general rule, function pointers can be compared to other function
pointers, function, 0, nullptr
+functions can be compared only against function pointers
----------------
Please highlight nullptr with ``.
================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/misc-comparison-function-address.cpp:16
@@ +15,3 @@
+
+
+void test_function_warning() {
----------------
Unnecessary empty line.
================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/misc-comparison-function-address.cpp:30
@@ +29,3 @@
+}
+
+
----------------
Unnecessary empty line.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23423
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
