dblaikie added a comment.

In D145077#4168209 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D145077#4168209>, @dblaikie wrote:

> In D145077#4162110 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D145077#4162110>, @aprantl wrote:
>
>> I originally was hoping we wouldn't have to introduce a new attribute for 
>> this, but it looks like there are legitimate concerns about the 
>> alternatives, so in that sense this looks good!
>
> Out of curiosity, what were the other existing attributes that were 
> considered? (would be curious to have them written down here to explain/add 
> strength to the motivation to add a new extension attribute)

Oh, I guess this discussion might go better in the llvm side that actually 
introduces the attribute D145076 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D145076>


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D145077/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D145077

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to