aaron.ballman added a comment. In D132398#4150851 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D132398#4150851>, @cor3ntin wrote:
> Given this has not made progress in a while, I think we should try to > implement > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2280r4.html instead > of this approach, as I'm not sure if that's strictly conforming, and a more > holistic approach is likely to lead to better results. > What do people think? P2280R4 was adopted for C++23, so I think we'll need to do the work eventually. It likely makes sense to explore doing that work now, at the very least so we don't make it harder to implement in the future. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D132398/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D132398 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
