aaron.ballman added a comment. In D140996#4150848 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D140996#4150848>, @bolshakov-a wrote:
>> Should this also update the status in clang/www/cxx_status.html? > > I'm not sure. There still remains an issue with template parameters of > reference type, which was tried to be fixed in 5a391d38ac6c > <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG5a391d38ac6c561ba908334d427f26124ed9132e>. (On > the other hand, MSVC team claims that their compiler supports P1907R1, > despite that it simply crashes on some of the test cases from 5a391d38ac6c > <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG5a391d38ac6c561ba908334d427f26124ed9132e>) Hmmm, okay, then I'd say we probably should update cxx_status. We can leave the status as "partial" but we can at least add details about what's still missing before we can claim full support. Kind of like we do for P0848R3 or P0315R4 on that page. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140996/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140996 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
