aaron.ballman added a comment. One thing that might also help is to split this into a few stages. 1) Add the new general functionality, 2) Replacing the existing implementation of keyword attributes with the new functionality where possible, 3) Add new attributes using the new functionality. It seems to me that we should be able to replace a bunch of our existing keyword attributes with the newer generalized approach (I'm thinking about ones like the calling convention attributes specifically, but we've got others as well), and that will help us prove the design as well as simplify the compiler implementation. WDYT?
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139028/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139028 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
