omtcyf0 added a subscriber: omtcyf0. omtcyf0 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279#511439, @bcraig wrote:
> I will agree that compilation databases are a (mostly) necessary, but not > sufficient part of the solution. The refactoring tool will need to be > careful about changing the structure definition. It needs to remember > (across TUs) what the old definition was and what the desired definition is, > so that it can correctly fix up the uses and initializer lists. If it saves > the files too aggressively, then there will be some serious problems. > > So lots of things for @alexshap to work on. Well, multi-TU support is needed for many tools and it is far beyond one tool implementation details if we want it to be nice. I want to have multi-TU support in the clang-refactor, but it is still in designing stage at the moment. At first, one translation unit might be okay, though. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
