jhuber6 added a comment. In D143306#4145482 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D143306#4145482>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> @jhuber6 Can you look into the last part, creating such a clang.cfg as part > of the build/install process? > > The fact that rpath is always set is a difference but I doubt it's that bad. > We effectively point only to the llvm runtimes, which should be what users > want anyway. > If this is really a problem, maybe we can/should separate the OpenMP runtimes > into a subfolder and rpath (-L) that one. Users get by default the OpenMP > runtimes associated with the clang, but we would not pollute anything else. If we do this as part of LLVM, what's the different between the config file and just setting `rpath` anyway? I figured that MaskRay was suggesting that each user curates their own and the LLVM install itself doesn't stipulate the `rpath` since it would lead to the same behavior. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143306/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143306 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
