Michael137 added a comment.
> This is what I meant by the "extension for the asm annotation for
> constructors" part. In principle, we could extend clang so that one can write
> something like this:
Ah thanks for elaborating. That's an interesting approach. So this would
require adding the asm extension to clang, emitting into DWARF some link from
subprogram to the various possible linkage names, and then putting it all
together in LLDB. I'll have a look at how feasible this might be
> It's definitely contrived, but I think one could write something like this:
> (lldb) expr --top-level class A : public virtual_class_from_DWARF {}
> (lldb) expr A().foo()
Cool, that's pretty neat, thanks. Can confirm that it tries to pick the C2
constructor (and works fine with the proposed patch series); so regardless of
where this goes, at the very least got another test-case :)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144181/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144181
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
