aaron.ballman added inline comments. ================ Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-else-after-return.rst:14 @@ -8,2 +13,3 @@ -http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#don-t-use-else-after-a-return +``` c++ +void foo(int Value) { ---------------- alexfh wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > aaron.ballman wrote: > > > Since we're talking about LLVM coding conventions, can you format this > > > like LLVM code (elide braces, etc)? > > This is not the proper way to introduce a code block. Should use `.. > > code-block:: c++` and then indent the code blocks. > I think, the braces are fine, since the example needs to demonstrate that the > check is able to remove them. Okay, that's a fair, but subtle, reason to leave them in.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23265 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
