NoQ added a comment.

Whoops, forgot to answer:

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23112#508333, @xazax.hun wrote:

> I am not sure that the checker is the appropriate way to fix the remaining 
> issue with this checker.


Yeah, there are anyway more problems that require this functionality in the 
`RangeConstraintManager` (the code throws complicated equations into it anyway, 
and there are false positives reported), so i think we should try to fix it 
there anyway, some day.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D23112



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to