hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/Preprocessor/has_attribute.cpp:51 // FIXME(201806L) CHECK: assert: 0 -// CHECK: carries_dependency: 200809L +// CHECK: carries_dependency: 0 // CHECK: deprecated: 201309L ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > hubert.reinterpretcast wrote: > > I'd trust this when I see the change to [cpp.cond]/6 arrive in CWG. > This is consistent with how we handle `[[no_unique_address]]` (see line 59). Is that driven by compatibility concerns on the platform though? For example, we might be doing something on line 59 to match MSVC. Do we know if GCC intends to make a similar change for `carries_dependency`? It may help to be more explicit about why our situation is different from GCC's. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143670/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143670 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
