aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/AST/Interp/loops.cpp:278
+
+namespace RangeForLoop {
+ constexpr int localArray() {
----------------
tbaeder wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > You should also add failure tests where the range-based for loop is not
> > valid in a constant expression. Especially interesting cases would be ones
> > involving lifetime problems, such as: https://godbolt.org/z/3EE7f8rdE
> Oof, that reproducer doesn't work right now for several reasons :/ Can you
> come up with something simpler?
Not trivially, no. Also, that case is now fixed by https://wg21.link/p2644r0
for C++23 due to lifetime extension that we probably don't model yet.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140803/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140803
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
