nickdesaulniers abandoned this revision. nickdesaulniers added a comment. In D142675#4084279 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142675#4084279>, @dblaikie wrote:
> This was discussed in D138597 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597> & we decided > not to implement these due to the risk of breaking existing v5 clients that > might not know about the post-v5-release codes. Implementing the v6 codes as > an extension might be an option, or emitting the post-v5-release codes as an > extension/under non-strict mode? > > But is there any particular value you're looking for by implementing these? Ah, sorry I was lacking that context. No value in particular, just looked like a bug when reading through this code. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142675/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142675 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
